Why is too much leverage bad for the economy ?
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper we show that competitive equilibrium prices and margin requirements naturally lead to too much leverage relative to the constrained optimum. We describe two mechanisms through which equilibrium forces lead agents to borrow too much and to hold too little collateral. To illustrate the first mechanism we present a very simple example without collateral and default where restricting borrowing leads to a Pareto-improvement over the competitive equilibrium allocation because financial markets are incomplete. Limiting borrowing naturally leads to a change in spot-prices that makes all agents better off. We then introduce collateral, default, endogenous margin requirements and production and we illustrate the second mechanism by showing that the endogenous margin requirements are suboptimal because they result in too much default. Finally we show how the two effects interact forcing agents to leverage less leads to a Pareto-improvement because it reduces default and because it reduces borrowing.
منابع مشابه
Competition in Healthcare: Good, Bad or Ugly?
The role of competition in healthcare is much debated. Despite a wealth of international experience in relation to competition, evidence is mixed and contested and the debate about the potential role for competition is often polarised. This paper considers briefly some of the reasons for this, focusing on what is meant by “competition in healthcare” and why it is more valuable to think about th...
متن کاملWhy does bad news increase volatility and decrease leverage?
The literature on endogenous leverage until now shows how an increase in volatility reduces leverage. However, in order to explain procyclical leverage it assumes that bad news increases volatility. This paper explains for the first time why bad news are associated with high volatility. We show that, in a model with endogenous leverage and heterogenous beliefs, most agents have the incentive to...
متن کاملDegree of Leverage Ratio Analysis in the Iranian Banking Network
The banks’ response to their changes in leverage ratios is examined and evaluated in this paper. This reaction can be interpreted as if the coefficient of total debts to equity (lev1) and total assets to equity (lev2) are positive as anticipated in the banking network of Iran. The paper uses data from 31 Iranian banks’ annual databases during the course of 2006-13 in order to estimate an empiri...
متن کاملOn Management Matters: Why We Must Improve Public Health Management Through Action; Comment on “Management Matters: A Leverage Point for Health Systems Strengthening in Global Health”
Public health management is a pillar of public health practice. Only through effective management can research, theory, and scientific innovation be translated into successful public health action. With this in mind, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has developed an innovative program called Improving Public Health Management for Action (IMPACT) which aims to address th...
متن کاملWHY DOES BAD NEWS INCREASE VOLATILITY AND DECREASE LEVERAGE? By
A recent literature shows how an increase in volatility reduces leverage. However, in order to explain pro-cyclical leverage it assumes that bad news increases volatility, that is, it assumes an inverse relationship between first and second moments of asset returns. This paper suggests a reason why bad news is more often than not associated with higher future volatility. We show that, in a mode...
متن کامل